User talk:Thruston

Pointers

Editing tutorial, learn to have fun with Wikipedia.

Picture tutorial, instructions on uploading images.

How to write a great article, to make it an featured article status.

Manual of Style, how articles should be written.

open tasks:

RC Patrol - Keeping a lookout for vandalism.

Cleanup - Help make unreadable articles readable.

Requests - Wanted on WP, but hasn't been created.

Merge - Combining duplicate articles into one.

Wikiprojects Projects

Sign on talk pages with four tildes.

Thruston 10:57, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Highlighting and sentences

New articles should begin with a complete sentence. The title word/phrase should first appear in bold

List of Munros

Great work with the maps for list of Munros. Just one thought, I think a bit of colour might make them even better. I've uploaded a version of section 1, what do you think? I am more than happy to do this for your other (excellent) maps. Grinner 09:08, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)

OK I must admit that your technical discussion lost me somewhat. I coloured the map using Paint! I will probably colour the rest this afternoon - I've not got a lot on at the moment. ;-) I'm sorry but I can;t help with your technical needs, but good luck, and replace my crude versions when you work out how to do it! Grinner 10:47, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)

The new contour maps are brilliant, just wanted to let you know! Grinner 08:04, May 11, 2005 (UTC)

Punting

You have made large contributions to this article (appreciated) but I am concerned as the style of writing seems more "informal guide" than "encyclopædia". I hope you didn't just copy straight from the reference books (as this would be a copyright violation), but if you could possibly rewrite your contributions in a suitable way that would be great. ed g2s • talk 00:29, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, not that I didn't find the piece amusing, but most of those comments can be considered POV. In its current state it would be more suitable for a wikibook or something. ed g2s • talk 12:22, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thruston, I see what you mean about my contribution on punt poles. I'll work on something a bit more balanced - the POV in favour of wooden poles seems to be that general held by puntsman in Cambridge, and some of it comes from a conversation with the puntsmen of my college. I'll start making the changes now. MikeMorley 14:16, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Strauss

"Fancy footwork" :) -- ALoan (Talk) 10:02, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oxford

I like your idea of smartening up tourist attraction, viewing 'Cat - Visitor attractions in Oxfordshire' is a bit boring, I'm not sure which way round to approach it, presumably Cat' pages are auto pick ups from Cat' markers, so editing that might cause maintenance problems. Any suggestions as I would like to help make it better.Alf 21:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) ooops - giving you a direct link put you on the Cat' page. : ) Alf 21:04, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) hmm that edit didn't work either : )Alf 21:08, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Pickwick

Yeah, it wasn't the VfD decision. But now that I think about it, if you want to use your editorial discretion and keep the merge/redir in place, I don't think anyone would mind. Just be sure to fix the disambiguation as well. Regards, Dmcdevit·t 19:32, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

Munro images again

Hi. It seems you've not put the PD tag onto Image:Munro-map-sec3.png and Image:Munro-map-sec4.png. The commons people are terribly strict about image tags, you you might want to tag them before someone there deletes them altogether.

I have to ask - what are you using to render the topographic info? I'm stuck using Panmap (which is horrid), so I'm looking for something more full-featured. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 19:38, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

You are famous

Check [1].--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 02:45, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, judging by your errors it's a clear case of journalist errors and defamation. I'd suggest that you 1) send an email to Times demanding apology and correction 2) ask at our IRC channel or some high-profile forum (Wikipedia:Village pump) what else to do.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 02:04, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, I blogged about you :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 02:23, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thruston, I've written a nice little letter to go to another paper (Independent OK with you?). Excuse me doing this, but it was a general attack on Wikipedia, so I feel any of us can defend it. Anyway, I take your name in vain, so you get to yay or nay this. Or amend it. See what you think :-) JackyR 06:55, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, a cute story about one of your rivals and Wikipedia.
On 12 February this year, the Sunday Times ran a short piece about how Wikipedia is full of graffiti-type rubbish by vandals. It even named some, described their attacks in detail and said that full details of what the vandals had written "can still be read by anyone logging on and viewing the history of updates."
Unfortunately, the Sunday Times writer (Maurice Chittenden) did not actually, er, do this. I've checked the edit history, and Chittenden's statements about one Thruston are verifiably false. In fact, they're detailed, circumstantial, and complete cobblers.
Which leaves us with two publications which contain false information. One comes with obvious caveats and the facility to remove false statements. And the other pretends to be a fully reliable source, and is notoriously cumbersome to correct (even if a correction is made in a subsequent edition, someone could pick up an archive copy of the false story and not know there was correction - unlike Wikipedia).
Full details: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-2036558,00.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2006-02-20/In_the_news
And if you want to check it all manually, go to the Wikipedia article on "Tony Blair", hit the "History" tab, and keep paging back to 16:43, 7 February.

Classics

Hi,

I run the classical civilisations portal on wikipedia, and am looking for advice on what to add next, or commentary on how i've done so far; I'm only as A-level student, and i wondered of you knew more about classics.

many thanks

Pydos 12:02, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Naturally. I'd appreciate any help. In the meanwhile i'll write a re-direct to the portal with the 'z' spelling - i can only blame my teacher! Thanks Pydos 10:46, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I learn that only recently, when I was doing my Eng lang coursework. I had, however, not appreciated that that this always happened with the 'ize' phoneme, so i thought (stupidly) that this would be 'economize' but otherwise 'economisation'. In the meanwhile I blame my teacher. Pydos 16:20, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Punt-medium.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Punt-medium.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Stan 04:07, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Money

I just found your synopsis of Martin Amis' Money. Great job. Thanks for all the hard work.

Punting in France

Hi & thanks for picking up on this sloppy entry. I have punted on Venise Verte (usually only the boat-hiring folk do it themselves, for you). The boats are much shorter (therefore less directional stability) and the whole thing appear to be a bit more 'rustic'. I suppose, really, that it is remarkably similar, so I've reworded. Let me know what you think Punt (boat). Ballista 02:22, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've now had a go at being more 'encyclopedic' - Thanks Ballista 03:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About changes in Biostatistics

Yeah, what you said sounds right. Sorry for the delay responding. Enrique Vargas 16:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Glenshiel

I've just come across this piece and your comment on the talk page. You're right-it's awful! You clearly have not had the time to attend to the problem yourself, so I will see waht I can do in the very near future. Rcpaterson 00:49, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erosion

Your point on human overuse is right on target. ive amended the article accordingly. see my more elaborate comments on the article talk page. Anlace 01:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citing William of Ockham

Just wanted to make sure that you saw this response on Wikipedia talk:Template messages/Sources of articles/Generic citations from Ligulem.

Exactly for these special cases is the "author" param. The idea behind the first last thing is, that usually the information tuple (last,year) can be used as an identification. So everything that is not last should go into first. And if you don't know what do, put everything into author. And if these templates here don't fit at all, don't use them. And keep in mind that on this wiki here, there is no requirement to use these templates. There are even Wikipedians, that don't like them at all. That's probably one of the reasons why you were reverted. The citation templates can only be used on a per article consensus. But don't go around removing the citation temlates from articles. There is no consensus for that either. --Ligulem 12:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

So basically you would replace last and first with author such as:

{{cite book
 | author = William of Ockham
 | authorlink = William of Ockham
 | title = Quodlibeta septem 
 | origdate = before 1327
 | publisher = Paris
 | year = 1487
}}

to get:

William of Ockham (1487). Quodlibeta septem. Paris. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |origdate= ignored (|orig-date= suggested) (help)

Note that this is an unusual case also because the publisher is not known but the location is - so I put the location and date as the publisher - since the publisher is a prerequisite to the location field. --Trödel 13:22, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually - I was wrong - there is also an original date field - I have updated above to make it work better --Trödel 13:36, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome - I agree with the comment son the talk page, though, using cite book is probably not the easiest thing to do in this case. --Trödel 19:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Munro Images

I really like the maps that you have created for the List of Munros. What software have you used to produce them? They look a lot like the kind of maps that GMT can produce, but if they are, I'd be interested to know what coastline data you're using as your dataset includes far more lakes than anything I can find — for example, in the map of region 4, the best dataset I can find includes Linnhe, Etive, Blackwater, Ericht and Lochy, but not Ossian, Treig, Moy or Laggan. -- ras52 11:48, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prof Bundy

Thanks. I do know there is always the possibility that somebody will add things out of vanity. I have set eyes on Colin Bundy once, so I don't think I count in that category. However, I did think it was a little, er, gratuitous (?) of somebody to list Winston Churchill among the alumni of the University of Bristol so I removed him, pointing out that a Chancellor is not really an alumnus. I reasoned that alumni bring honour to the university while chancellorships are more a way of the university honouring a public figure (albeit in return for some glamour). I must check to see if the Duke of Edinburgh is down as a Cambridge alumnus or the Queen Mother and Princess Royal as London alumnae. (And perhaps should check the actual meaning of alumnus before I go accusing people of not being one). Regarding the former college barman whom you seem to wish to remove from that list, couldn't he be dropped on the technicality that he (presumably) didn't matriculate?--Oxonian2006 00:00, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merton userbox

I have mocked up a new Merton userbox (you are the only other person using it).

What do you think? --Danrees 14:27, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Lon

Hi Thruston!

Just thought I'd say hi and thanks for signing up to WikiProject London. The scope of the WikiProject is absolutely massive, and there is really are limitless ways in which you can contribute. Furthermore, we are looking to shake up the WikiProject in order to make it more relevant and give it more clarity - feel free to edit the WikiProject page to add new tasks or highlight any current issues. Anything you see from other WikiProjects or pages could be good!

Overall, it's great you have joined and I look forward to many successful collaborations in the future!

Cheers, DJR (T) 20:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Merton-college-crest.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Merton-college-crest.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Durin 15:30, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jasper-Fforde-publicity-portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jasper-Fforde-publicity-portrait.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 15:55, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject University of Oxford

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the University of Oxford. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! Casper Gutman 15:51, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Mark-Haddon-publicity-portrait.png

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Mark-Haddon-publicity-portrait.png. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree 22:22, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Arne-Jacobsen-Ant-chair.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Arne-Jacobsen-Ant-chair.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

London Meetup - January 12, 2008

Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over at Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 02:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A new Oxbridge user box

Thruston...I am currently in the process of writing a user box for all of the colleges that are part of Oxbridge. This template is meant to replace your current college template. Please take a look at the work in progress and comment on it. My main concerns are college abbreviations and color choice. I am using scarf colors for the colleges. Thank you. - LA @ 17:14, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Cardinal Puff

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Cardinal Puff, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Cardinal Puff is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Cardinal Puff, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:31, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion of In case of emergency

In case of emergency

A tag has been placed on In case of emergency, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of In case of emergency and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Medicellis (talk) 21:26, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Punt construction image

Hi Toby. Excuse my pedantry, but as a fellow Oxonian, may I quibble the labelling of the Stern and Bow in your fine sketch? You appear to be advocating the backward approach used at the Fenland Polytechnic, where the punter stands on the slippery deck high above the waterline - quite obviously not as God or nature intended. Maybe "Oxford End" and "Cambridge End" would be more approprate? Cheers, TrulyBlue (talk) 20:18, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Wikipedia meetup in London

Wikimedia UK logo

Date: 13:00 onwards, Sunday 10 August 2008

Venue: Penderel's Oak pub, Holborn WC1 map

More information: Wikipedia:Meetup/London 12

Hello,

I noticed that you have listed yourself as a Wikipedian in London, so I thought you might like to come to one of our monthly social meetups. The next one is going to be on Sunday 10 August, which might well be rather short notice, but if you can't come this time, we try to have one every second Sunday of the month.

If you haven't been before, these meetups are mainly casual social events for Wikipedia enthusiasts in which we chat about Wikipedia and any other topics we fancy. It's a great way to meet some very keen Wikipedians, but we'd also love for you to come along if you're interested in finding out more about Wikipedia, other Wikimedia projects, or other collaborative wiki projects too.

The location is a pub that is quite quiet and family friendly on a Sunday lunchtime, so hopefully younger Wikipedians will also feel welcome and safe. Alcohol consumption is certainly not required!

Although the meetups are popular, many UK-based editors still don't know about them. It would be great to welcome some fresh faces, so I hope you can come along.

Yours,

James F. (talk) 09:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please forgive the slightly impersonal mass-invite!

AfD nomination of One Fat Hen

I have nominated One Fat Hen, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Fat Hen. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. MBisanz ^talk 01:53, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

London Wikimedia Fundraiser

Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.

Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 00:05, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London

For our first official recruitment drive! Starting on Wednesday the 9th of February at 12:30pm. We would love to have you!

All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 12:00, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:58, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of rowing venues, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caversham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Thruston. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Thruston. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Punt-medium.png

The file File:Punt-medium.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low-res, no obvious use. Superseded by File:Punt-construction.png.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]