Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luser Attitude Readjustment Tool
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Transwiki or merge with something. no consensus to delete. --Rhobite 21:55, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)
Dicdef of a sysadmin slang term from the Jargon File. Unlikely to grow any larger. jdb ❋ (talk) 04:26, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. "Luser Attitude Readjustment Tool" is a famous hacker expression, and without articles like these its meaning is not immediately obvious. 193.167.132.66 07:28, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- You're right in that the meaning is non-obvious, but Wikipedia is not a guide to jargon usage. jdb ❋ (talk) 08:37, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Dicdef'ish... transwiki, or merge into hacker slang. Radiant! 08:52, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Concur Kappa 08:57, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Transwiki, redirect this entry to hacker slang - David Gerard 15:04, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- DeleteIt is a dicdef, so it should be deleted, BUT, it should be moved to Wiktionary, which welcomes dicdefs :). I've placed a basic entry at Wiktionary:Luser Attitude Readjustment Tool.Superm401 02:28, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Is it meant to be Loser... ? Jeff Knaggs|Talk 12:24, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect dicdef to BOFH and/or luser. Thue | talk 12:36, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete context-free dicdef. CDC (talk) 04:25, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete but move to Wiktionary, unless someone adds some historical information about it, like what's in the luser article. Or maybe THAT should be moved to Wiktionary too. Shadowlord | talk 17:45, 27 Feb 2005
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.