User talk:Xavic69
Hello there Xavic69, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page and experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions or how to format them visit our manual of style. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump. BTW, thanks for starting Gascon language. Cheers! --maveric149
Just a clarification... The Sephirah are the emanations of God, i.e. the nodes, and the Tree of Life is the whole thing, right? So the whole diagram (and concept) is not called "The Sephirah"?
The reason I ask is that I want to make sure a Tree of Life (Kabbala) article would not be redundant.
Thanks!
lunaverse 01:31, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Geometric algebra
[edit]Hello. You put a link to clausure in geometric algebra. I don't know what that word means, but it redirects to closure, which is (as you would probably expect) a disambiguation page. I've pointed it at closure (mathematics) after surmising that that's probably what you intended.
- closure (mathematics) was what I meant. I misspelt the word when translating it.
You're using too many Capital Letters. See my recent edits to that article and you'll see what I mean. Michael Hardy 20:32, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Xavic69,
Please let me know what you think and if you agree on my comment on Talk:Tibet. If you do, would you be able to help me in changing User:Nathan Hill's edits so that it has both methods of spelling with Wylie not as the default? ---User:Hottentot
Adiu!
[edit]Ai vist que parlas occitan! Avem besonh d'ajuda e de contribucions per far avançar lo projècte en lenga d'òc... Ès benvengut se vòls participar! :)
A lèu! [[1]]
Cedric31 21:11, 21/02/06 (UTC)
Distiction between optical density and absorbance
[edit]In the article on optical absorbance you made the edit that it is absorbance/pathlength. However, I can't find a source that verifies this. I agree that your definition makes more sense than simply saying absorbance and optical density are synonymous but it would be good to cite a reference.
Where does your definition come from, and could you add it to the reference?
-Justin
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
[edit]Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 21:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
June 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dracaena braunii may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Italics
[edit]We don't italicize biological family names in Wikipedia. See MOS:LIFE. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:04, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Xavic69. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Bottomness has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article says "This term is rarely used" so I think it is not notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chidgk1 (talk) 10:52, 14 October 2023 (UTC)