Talk:Snaefell Mountain Railway

Snaefell Mountain Railway was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 23, 2005	Good article nominee	Listed
April 6, 2007	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

UK Trams (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Trams, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.UK TramsWikipedia:WikiProject UK TramsTemplate:WikiProject UK TramsUK Trams articles

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
Sel	week 20, 2006

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

Isle of Man

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Isle of Man, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Isle of Man on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Isle of ManWikipedia:WikiProject Isle of ManTemplate:WikiProject Isle of ManIsle of Man articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Snaefell Mountain Railway RDT.

Grade?

What is steepest grade of this line?

Syd1435 23:01, 2004 Nov 7 (UTC)

GA Re-Review and In-line citations

Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. LuciferMorgan 00:32, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article Review

This article is currently at Good Article Review. LuciferMorgan 11:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was delisted by 3-0. LuciferMorgan 20:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing at bow collector

A recent addition has raised the interesting point that the bow collectors are rigid, not sprung. Can anyone help with sourcing for this? Thanks Andy Dingley (talk) 13:50, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The bow collectors are sprung (an adaptation of the Hopkinson Bow collectors) rather than rigid as described on page 158 of the publication Isle of Man Tramways Pearson (1970). agljones(talk)19:52, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Snaefell Mountain Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]