Talk:Minimum message length

This is complete nonsense -- blanking. User:194.51.2.34

Care to correct the two references, then, since you claim to understand it better? One is in philosophy of science. The other is on a talk page. User:142.177.94.99

I was removing only your usage, which is idiosyncratic -- the material is well-covered at Occam's razor and the AIT article. 194.51.2.34 13:30, 22 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Should it be redirected to one of them, then? -- Oliver P. 13:35, 22 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Yes. This sat obviously for a long time without being filled, so I just backfilled it when I noticed. I have no opinion about the material here, and maybe oversimplified it since I didn't care. By all means redirect it. Just don't leave links sitting open or blank pages. User:142.177.94.99

Well, actually, leaving links sitting open is what the Wikipedia is all about! It's a wiki, you see. It's how we attract new content on new subjects. :) Now, where should it be redirected to...? -- Oliver P. 14:09, 22 Aug 2003 (UTC)

To Occam's Razor, if it is indeed a restatement of that principle. The issue raised with MML is also an issue with OC - all else is never equal, and, one can't ignore the foundations of measurement which gave rise to the data, bits, signal. User:142.177.94.99

I'm very late to that discussion. But a key point about MML is that it can compare when things are not equal. --crt 11:34, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)

I notice the link to the Needham & Dowe article links to Ockham's Razor, but does not link to the wiki page Occam's Razor. Perhaps it should do that instead, with a possible extra link at OR? And is that article the best in-print counterargument to anti-parsimony claims? --crt 11:34, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Posterior?

"Therefore the posterior is always a probability, not a probability density."

What is a posterior? In this case, I know it isn't the common sense of a buttock. --Damian Yerrick 03:10, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Merge MDL and MML?

I was under the impression that MDL and MML are significantly different (at least to people within the field), with the same order of significance as say the difference between best-first search and A*. I shall ask people who know these things to comment. njh 06:36, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

C.S. Wallace describes the difference as follows (Statistical and Inductive Inference by Minimum Message Length, p 408): "MDL differs from MML in two important respects. First, Rissanen wishes to avoid use of any "prior information". His view is very much non-Bayesian. Second, given data x, MDL aims to infer the model class Theta_k [i.e. model complexity, number of model parameters] which best explains the data, but does not aim to infer the parameter vector theta_k [i.e. actual values of parameters] except (in some versions) as a step involved in inferring the class." --pfh, 26 Dec 2005

Yes, Rissanen was very blunt on separating MDL from Bayesianism (Personal communication, 1991 :-) I'll see if I can find my hardcopies of his papers. User:Ejrrjs says What? 21:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge MDL and MML?

That's my understanding too, "MDL and MML are significantly different". Non-B v. B., class v. model, not infer v. infer parameters. --LA, 12 January 2006.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Minimum message length. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081216122608/http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/axm033v1 to http://bjps.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/axm033v1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On definitions

I do not agree with the statement:

Shannon's A Mathematical Theory of Communication (1948) states that in an optimal code, the message length (in binary) of an event $E$ , $\operatorname {length} (E)$ , where $E$ has probability $P(E)$ , is given by $\operatorname {length} (E)=-\log _{2}(P(E))$ .

When a code is designed such that $\operatorname {length} (E)=-\log _{2}(P(E))$ , we get what is called "Shannon Code", which is generally not optimal. Also, I did not find this statement in Shannon's paper. Corrado Mencar (talk) 10:29, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]