Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark Sector
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 11:52, Jan 26, 2005 (UTC)
Advertisement for vaporware. While not unheard-of, it's unusual for vaporware to be notable. --Kelly Martin 01:47, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Cdc 01:56, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, cleanup and expand. This game is hardly vaporware and is no more undeserving than any other title coming within the next year or so that already has a Wikipedia entry. K1Bond007 06:37, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. The game isn't on the market. If it's sold and is notable in some way, then create the article. (What, there are articles about other computer games that have never been marketed? They probably deserve to be zapped as well.) -- Hoary 08:55, 2005 Jan 20 (UTC)
- Comment - A game that hasn't been released is hardly grounds to delete an article. There are tons of unreleased movies, albums, and etc on Wikipedia. K1Bond007 02:08, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I fail to see how this can be encyclopedia-worthy when it's not released yet. If it has had any noteworthy press coverage, please add it to the article. Otherwise, delete and come back when it actually exists. Mgm|(talk) 09:05, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. MArketing campaing about a not yet available game. Gtabary 18:46, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Weak Keep, needs expansion. Megan1967 02:56, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Vaporware isn't notable unless it achieves the infamy of Duke Nukem Forever or (some would say) Windows Longhorn. --TenOfAllTrades 04:31, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, don't bother to recreate when the game is released; WP is not a product catalog. Wile E. Heresiarch 07:50, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete; not notable. Jayjg | (Talk) 01:08, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Merge into Digital Extremes which has a fairly short article that would problably benefit from the merge anyway. --Sketchee 08:31, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Speculation on future releases is not encyclopedic. — Gwalla | Talk 20:13, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.