Talk:Fragaria

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Agriculture Mid‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redirect to strawberry again

It's time to put the redirect back to Strawberry. The strawberry page has improved substantially since the redirect was removed. If there is no objection in the next week, I'll put the redirection to strawberry back into place.Nereocystis 07:07, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Done. --Jerome K. 09:36, 2005 May 11 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 18:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wild strawberry

there is no mention of this variety of the fruit. the term redirects to a disambig page, i will redirect it here.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:40, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Potential reference

Amil-Ruiz, F. et al. ”The Strawberry Plant Defense Mechanism: A Molecular Review”, Plant & Cell Physiology (2011),52(11):1873-1903.

--Ronz (talk) 21:53, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your opinion and suggestion.

This review is meant for readers who would like to delve deeper into the subject. The review is placed in the “further reading” – section because the Wikipedia guideline for this section read: “… publications that would help interested readers learn more about the article subject. The Further reading section (…) should normally not duplicate the content of the References section” (WP:FURTHER).

The Wikipedia content guideline for “Identifying reliable sources (medicine)” (WP:MEDRS) read: “It is usually best to use reviews and meta-analyses where possible.”

The review in question reflect the latest research (last 10 years) in the field, it is scholarly and peer-reviewed, and it is published in an academic journal. Granateple (talk) 23:15, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Centralized discussion at Talk:Cranberry#Moved_from_article:_Review_articles_on_possible_health_benefits. --Ronz (talk) 03:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

French Illutration

Yupp, thats why I came to english wiki. Just to get more of your french useless jibberish... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.251.171.229 (talk) 03:38, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

True berries?

Wouldn't it make more sense to say that strawberries are not true botanical berries? There is a culinary/common use of "berry" that isn't any less legitimate. This is comparable to tomato being a botanical fruit but not a culinary fruit. 2600:6C40:5800:C4C:3E3D:4531:22FE:3E39 (talk) 12:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The current phrasing is unnecessarily confusing (although only mildly). Invasive Spices (talk) 10 March 2022 (UTC)

I agree too, and have made a change. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Etym

This derives from the Latin word for strawberries and has nothing whatsoever to do with "fragrant" or "fragrance" (wikt). I left the previous mistake in place, assuming that an editor picked it up from a bad source or that it represents a commonish misconception. If it was simply a single editor's OR mistake, it's fine to remove it entirely. — LlywelynII 11:15, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]