Jump to content

Wikipedia:Article improvement drive/Removed/8 May 2005

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nominations

[edit]
Next two project articles to be selected on Sunday 8 May. Ten nominations are voted on each week, please put overflow nominations under Pending.


Reason
One of the most famous and celebrated rivers in the world and it barely gets a page of information. Ganymead 22:29, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Support
  1. Ganymead 22:29, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  2. McDogm--64.12.116.67 14:42, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

Reason
Nominated for WP:COTW but unfortunately didn't have enough votes.
Support
  1. Tony Jin | (talk) 01:56, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
  2. RJH 19:20, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  3. Ganymead 20:09, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  4. Pedro 02:49, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

Reason
This article has great potential, but at the moment it is lacking in finer details. Xaliqen 03:52, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Support
  1. Xaliqen 03:52, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  2. Ganymead 04:19, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) I added some notes on Japanese Theatre.
  3. Petersam 21:18, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

Reason
Trying to read sections of this article has given me a headache. The information presented needs improvement, and the page itself does not comform to the established template for country articles. Da 'Sco Mon
Support
  1. Da 'Sco Mon 02:04, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  2. Ganymead 02:26, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Comments

Reason
The article is very much incomplete. Seemingly focused on Giantesses then any other form of giant. Needs expansion and clean-up.
Support
  1. Louisisthebest_007 21:21, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  2. Contaru 21:29, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  3. Tails623 22:47, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  4. Pentalis 20:00, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC - 4:00 (Chile))
Comments

Reason
Far from comprehensive, totally unsourced, little depth, possibly biased. Particularly needs information about religious perspectives on social justice (it is a major tenet of many Christian denominations), views around the world, views over time, and interaction with other political philosophies. -- Tetraminoe
Support
  1. Tetraminoe 15:16, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  2. Ganymead 20:08, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  3. Litefantastic 00:18, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Comments

Reason
It has about fifty subpages and a sequel, not to mention being a pivotal work in whatever strange astral plane of derangement it occupies.
Support
  1. Litefantastic 00:18, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Comments

Reason
Why does the second-largest city in Washington have an article that is only a fifth as long as Seattle's?
Support
  1. Puget Sound 19:50, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  2. Ganymead 04:36, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Comments

Reason
Very stubbish article about a very influential African-American author. - Stancel 10:58, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Support
  1. Stancel 10:59, 20 Apr 2005
  2. Ganymead 22:45, 1 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comments

Reason
Only one sentence in the entire article for a very important Native American language.
Support
  1. Stancel
  2. Ganymead 02:41, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  3. Whimemsz 20:01, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
Comments

Pending nominations

[edit]
Reason
Desperately needs "article improvement drive" status.
Support
  1. Stancel 11:06, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Comments
  • SUPPORT!: This is a topic that requires much research and should be a challenge. Therefore I have concluded this will be the only way to get people to research this very interesting topic. I found out about this while researching Venezuela and I thought this topic would be a good thing to make a Wikipedia article about. Unfortunately, this is something that not many will even notice, so basically I have been the only one contributing to this article. I would love it if this could be improved and be one step closer to becoming a featured article. For research, there is a good resource that I put in the "Sources" section, it's called "A Girardian reading of the myth of Maria Lionza", it has pages and pages of information. If you use a search engine, you should be able to find alot of information in English but there's also alot of information in Spanish so if you know both languages (like me) that is a plus. Please support this article. - Stancel 11:11, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Reason
Nominated on COTW but may be too long to be a stub
Support
  1. Beland 01:21, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Stancel 15:38, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Fenice 06:54, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
Reason
Article could be improved, in honor of today the 5th of May! VIVA MEXICO! ;-)
Support
  1. Stancel 16:23, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
Reason
The article is slightly verbose and needs some expert editing to become a featured article . I hope wikipedians improve this article.
Support
  1. User:Sumalsn 21:33, 6 May 2005
  2. User:Sudheeren 06:52, 8 May 2005
Comments

The article is good and seems throrughly reasearched. needs alittle bit improvement - 06:52, 8 May 2005 Sudheeren

Reason
Currently a stub. Could be improved alot, including pictures and examples of bumper stickers. Their history, their political use, etc. Millions of people have some kind of bumper sticker on their car, so I think this article should at least be longer than it is now.
Support
  1. Stancel 01:02, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comments