Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James L. Sharon Jr.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. JeremyA 03:20, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Vanity. Main claim for fame is him being a "film producer" as can be seen in an contribution by the same anonymous editor at December 26, but neither Google nor the IMDb have heard of him. -- Eugene van der Pijll 09:29, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable, vanity. Quale 09:42, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. it states that he hung out in pools as a child, but doesnt bother to name any of the films he's produced. Nateji77 09:49, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Should at least be on IMDB before being on WP. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 10:08, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- no, it shouldnt. if you submit to IMDb and wikipedia at the same time, the submission will display here instantly, but will have to wait to be reviewed by an editor at IMDb, which sometimes takes several weeks. but if he was submitted to IMDb, that submission would have to include names of his films, which this article doesnt yet do. Nateji77 10:22, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Ok, my original arguement may be flawed. But I still say delete since Google has not heard of him either. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 20:49, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, it should. Wikipedia is not a primary source. Your argument is tantamount to saying that it's all right to accept unverifiable material because that pesky process of getting something known outside of Wikipedia takes so gosh-darned long. That's false. It's not all right. Uncle G 05:19, 2005 Jun 5 (UTC)
- no, it shouldnt. if you submit to IMDb and wikipedia at the same time, the submission will display here instantly, but will have to wait to be reviewed by an editor at IMDb, which sometimes takes several weeks. but if he was submitted to IMDb, that submission would have to include names of his films, which this article doesnt yet do. Nateji77 10:22, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- "teamed up with a proven veteran" again unnamed. Sure, we don't need IMDB per se, but it would help greatly with verifying. Delete as being unverifiable. Mgm|(talk) 11:56, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn vanity. If he's been in the film biz for a while (and not just several weeks as per their turn around time ;) ), you'd think he'd be in IMDB. --Etacar11 22:49, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete vanity. JamesBurns 03:44, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete vanity. Notability not established. Certainly the illustrious Mr. Sharon can wait for inclusion until he develops some credits on the IMDb. carmeld1 21:55, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.