User talk:Jperlin

I just noticed that no one has edited your talk since April of 2004. I thought I'd rectify that situation.

)

FuelWagon 03:35, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Star Trek boat controversy nominated for deletion

I've nominated this for deletion - meaning no offence, but I can't see how we can possibly verify anything relating to this 'controversy' using reliable secondary sources (forum posts are a primary source). And I apologise for my ~~sarcas~~ ironic comment in the nomination, but I couldn't resist :-) --Malthusian (talk) 23:10, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article Speedy Deletion Warning

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Alex Hunter. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Boricuaeddie^{Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!} 20:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Canadian_Tuxedo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Canadian_Tuxedo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly ^hi! 17:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cheese crisp

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cheese crisp, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

This article seems somewhat pointless. Cheese crisps are crackers where I come from on the East Coast.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RandomHumanoid^(⇒) 19:39, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Galactus Edit War Mediation

Hi. I'm trying to mediate an edit war over the Galactus article here. Can you chime in with your two cents? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 23:59, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

America Alone proposed for deletion

Proposed deletion of America Alone

The article America Alone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

this article adds nothing to what it is already on author's main article

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 15:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of America Alone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article America Alone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/America Alone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cs32en Talk to me 12:27, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]