User talk:193.113.48.9

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 193.113.48.9, is registered to BT Public Internet Service and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

July 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Winchester City F.C. on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Gimboid13 09:57, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 2006

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Szvest 12:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Szvest 12:59, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -- Szvest 13:03, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Ogilvy & Mather on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. cholmes75 ^{(chit chat)} 14:56, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Charlton Athletic F.C. (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

October 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Ninja, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Anger22 13:36, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 2006

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to 1980s, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nlu (talk) 12:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Litvinenko - December 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Attilios (talk • contribs) Dec 5, 2006

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content, as you did to Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Fl e x (talk|contribs) 21:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{Tfd-inline|Civil1}}

It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that preventive administrative action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks! Gdavidp 15:39, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Apex156

Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Apex156, you will be blocked. smileydude66 17:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool F.C.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Liverpool F.C., are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. --Ytny (talk) 16:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007.

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Hips Don't Lie. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Acalamari 16:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Byker Wall, you will be blocked from editing. James086^{Talk | Email} 10:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to TNA Impact!, you will be blocked from editing. --Aaru Bui ^DII 06:55, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Thank you for your contribution to TVR, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the Sandbox to get started. Thank you. Bob talk 13:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sept. 2007

Thanks for experimenting with the page UFC on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you.

MMAfan2007 17:15, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Wirral Peninsula, will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Coldmachine^Talk 10:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Augustus, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. EALacey 11:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They is no way for you to revert something that disallowed in Wikipedia policy under the WP:NOT in 2010 FIFA World Cup qualification, that statistics is not necessary to have. --Aleen f1 10:41, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 11:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tapton School, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 09:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Linfield F.C.

Hi. I was interested in this edit ([1]). Which other team/s have played in the FA Cup but never lost a game? --Dweller (talk) 11:25, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bananaman, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Tiptoety (talk) 08:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Andrew Parsons. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. StephenBuxton (talk) 12:34, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Feiz Mohammad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. {{{2}}} Will ^(talk) 15:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Feiz Mohammad. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 15:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Feiz Mohammad. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 15:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Verve, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Verve was changed by 193.113.48.9 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-02-04T14:09:00+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 14:09, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to The Verve constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 14:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page List of reggae sound systems do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://www.myspace.com/sequoiasoundsystem) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 10:05, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page List of reggae sound systems do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://www.myspace.com/sequoiasoundsystem) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 14:45, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

May 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Discovery Expedition. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AlexiusHoratius (talk) 19:46, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to August 2004 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 11:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Edenbridge, Kent do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Charles (talk) 17:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Corrina Joseph has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://myspace.com/corrinajoseph, http://www.myspace.com/corrinajoseph (redirect from http://myspace.com/corrinajoseph)).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Dundee F.C. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Orphan Wiki 15:29, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of England Test cricket records with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 17:50, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Hello, I'm Mephistophelian. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Cayman, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Mephistophelian (contact) 13:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Draperstown because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 10:25, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2013

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ander Herrera with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TYelliot | Talk | Contribs 13:31, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eric Clapton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 18:03, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2014

Hello, I'm Frosty. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Dundee United F.C., because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Frosty ☃ 11:18, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to John Madden, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 02:56, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Stop making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Guru Nanak. Your edits constitute childish vandalism and have been removed. You appear to have a record of vandalism and you may be banned from editing if you persist. Apuldram (talk) 15:16, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism, as you did to Peter Jones (entrepreneur), will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. ToonLucas22 (talk) 16:25, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: AnchorCert Gem Laboratory (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AnchorCert Gem Laboratory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 21:33, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to BT Group— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 11:17, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Hello, I'm Randykitty. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Tiwari because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Randykitty (talk) 14:29, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ashley Williams (footballer), you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:09, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ashley Williams (footballer). Mattythewhite (talk) 13:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ashley Williams (footballer), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:55, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your draft article, Draft:AnchorCert Gem Laboratory

Hello, 193.113.48.9. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "AnchorCert Gem Laboratory".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 18:11, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm Accurizer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Emlyn Jones has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Accurizer (talk) 16:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at BT Group with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. David.moreno72 (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at BT Group, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 16:28, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to City of Wakefield— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:48, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, BT Italia, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Hello, I'm Dirkbb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gavin Patterson have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dirkbb (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, RTFM, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 00:44, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to RTFM. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 00:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Your recent editing history at Amphibious assault ship shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BilCat (talk) 01:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Amphibious assault ship. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BilCat (talk) 01:18, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nick-D (talk) 07:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Strangers in the Night seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:24, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, good point. 193.113.48.9 (talk) 10:25, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to BT Group. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:47, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't my personal analysis though, it was a statement of fact. 193.113.48.9 (talk) 19:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to BT Group, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 18:04, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Craig Dawson. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019

Hello, I'm Kosack. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Andy Mitchell (footballer, born 1976) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Kosack (talk) 15:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.