Talk:2004 European Parliament election in the United Kingdom

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

European Union Low‑importance

	European Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Given that there is one less MEP for each constituency (apart from SW England and Northern Ireland), what does the 'Change of Seats' figure mean? Is this compared to a hypothetical election with 1999 votes but the seats as present? Morwen - Talk 22:21, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I'm basing it on the way the BBC is doing it. They've adjusted their figures to take account of the drop of seats. I'm not sure exactly how they've done that. Annoyingly the BBC have not updated their results for Yorkshire and the Humber. David Newton 22:27, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I've removed the figures because having them their but not updated is worse than nothing. Morwen - Talk 22:59, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)

The calculation for the adjustment on the 1999 results is easy because of the way the MEPs are elected. Outside of Northern Ireland (which uses STV), MEPs elected under the D'Hont formula whereby at each stage you divide the number of votes polled by a party by the number of seats so far won. Since the process does not use the number of MPs at any point other than the finishing post, it is possible to both calculate who "loses" a seat when the number available is cut (whoever wins the last one) and equally who would "gain" if the number were expanded. I hope that explanation makes sense! Timrollpickering 01:49, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Does anyone agree with me that the map is not very informative or very attractive? It doesn't identify the electorates by name and the dots aren't easy to distinguish or interpret. Plus it's only England. Can someone come up with a better one? Adam 14:39, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Restructure

I would like to restriucture this article, combining the members and results section and putting the members in the tables. What do others think? AndrewRT - Talk 19:55, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well I've done the East Midlands - what do others think? Should I do the rest the same? AndrewRT(Talk) 21:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The map's wrong. Labour have 2 MEP's in Wales, Conservative 1 and Plaid 1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwerty1985 (talk • contribs) 10:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should break down England, Scotland and Wales (like we have Northern Ireland). I think it would make more sense that way to do it nation by nation. --Richardeast (talk) 21:33, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on European Parliament election, 2004 (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:54, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Map

The "Partial map, showing most popular party by counting area on Great Britain only" seems dubious to me in terms of Scotland. It would seem to show the Conservative getting the most votes in the Dundee East and Dundee West county areas, which certainly was not the case. Dundee Council's website records the SNP as having the most votes in Dundee East, with the Conservatives in 3rd place - See [1]. In Dundee West Labour had the most votes and again the Conservaives were in third - see [2]. Likewise all 3 Aberdeen seats are shown as blue, but if memory serves Aberdeen South did give most votes to the Conservatives, but Labour had most votes in Aberdeen Central and the SNP most votes in Aberdeen North, a seat where it would have been very unlikely for the Conservatives to come top of the poll. Given this it is possible that there are other errors in the map and I think it might be worth removing it. Dunarc (talk) 20:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]