User talk:Anilocra/archive1

This contains stuff from Jan - May, 2005.

Excellent work!

You did some really nice work on acanthocephala; it's almost as though you have some pre-existing knowledge of fish parasitology! Seriously though, the end product is a beautiful article. Thank you for your hard work. – Clockwork Soul 20:33, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Re: Newcomer award

Posted on User_talk:ClockworkSoul

Thanks very much for the newcomer award - thought I'd better start with something I knew about. It's amazing what you can do when you're trying to put off real work... ;)

Anilocra 22:26, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

You're very welcome: you deserve it. I know exactly what you mean about putting off work: most of the time I spent writing chemical warfare was stolen, in one form or another, from some other more important task. In fact, what do you think I was doing when I gave you the award? ;) – Clockwork Soul 13:04, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism

Sorry for accusing you of vandalism. When I took a look at your user page you didn't stike me as a vandal. --JK the unwise 18:40, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Re: l33t wiki skillz!!!

Thanks! I put a lot of time and effort into it. :) – Clockwork Soul 15:18, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Rex

Thanks for your help dealing with this problem user (216.153.214.94). It's been a pleasant four months, thanks to the ArbCom's partial block of him, but I guess the holiday's over. JamesMLane 16:27, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain (JML), he goes around stoking problems, then feigns suprise when people react against him. 216.153.214.94 03:38, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The buttplug award

AWESOME! I love it. Thanks alot for that. :> Inter\^Echo 14:37, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Scottish Civil War

Hi, good work on the SCW battles. Just want to make one point though, the Covenanters were not the same thing as the English parliamentarians. they were allied to them from 1643-1647, but then fought against them from 1648-51. Also, recent studies have cast a lot of doubt on Montrose's "military genius", which was given a lot of spin by the Royalist camp at the time. Almost all his troops were actually commanded by Alasdair MacColla - Irish Confederates and anti Campbell clans. Montrose was unable to raise any of these men without MacColla. Whats more, when Montrose fell out with MacColla in 1646, he was pretty quickly routed and forced into exile. And MacColla was not even a real Royalist, he took his orders (politically speaking) from his clan chief, Randall MacDonald, earl of Antrim and then from the Irish Confederate's Supreme Council. I suppose the point I'm making is that the Scottish war was in a lot of ways a thing in itself, rather than an extension of the war in England. Anyway, well done, Jdorney

Yes, those royalist casualties do look very low, and yes, there probably is a bit of royalist propaganda there. However, the royalist losses at Tippermuir, Aberdeen and Inverlochy probably were very small. One thing to be aware of is that in warfare at the time, far more casualties werre usually inflicted in pursuit of a beaten enemy than in the actual face to face fighting. The side with the least discipline and training would break and run first, losing all cohesion as a group and no longer being able to defend themselves. The side pursuing them could cut them down in very large numbers with very little loss to themselves. This is exactly what happened at these three battles, so the very low royalist losses are plausible. In a battle where there was hard fighting before one side broke such as Aldearn, the winning side would take more casualties, but still their losses would be far smaller than the army that was broken and pursued. Losses would be more equal in a battle -such as the Boyne or Culloden - where the losing side had their retreat covered by a disciplined rearguard, preventing the pursuit or "execution" as it was called at the time.

One other point re unaccounted for royalist casualties. they could well have been un-reported battlefield losses, but they could also have been disease victims - there was a plague in scotland from 1645-49 - or deserters. A lot of Montrose's highland troops tended to go home after a battle and did not want to fight far away from their home areas and others were only there because they had been intimidated into joining in the first place.

Jdorney

Glen Coe

Thanks for the thanks on the Massacre of Glencoe! Incidentally I think the roll call of soldiers would be worth adding the article. I am studying Chemical Engineering at Newcastle, but I only edit wikipedia pages on my "outside interests" (mainly Scottish hills and rugby league). Grinner 13:28, Mar 29, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

Cheers mate, --SqueakBox 15:36, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)

Vandals

Hi. I've blocked Musichopper indefinetely and reverted his vandalism. Hopefully he/she will either behave better in the future or get bored and leave. Carbonite | Talk 16:06, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Female cyclists

Yes, I added a string of IP addresses being used to ViP, and some of the pages were protected for a while. There's a very sad individual out there... Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 08:50, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanx

Thank you for the welcome, I'm very keen on teh Wikipedia Site and I've just finished my first article Zonelabs but I can't put it into the Internet section. Can you help me?

--JPat

Cool

Yeah, I decided to try studying for my parasitology test by putting my notes and textbook info on wikipedia. Between now and wednesday afternoon, I'm hoping to put everything I know about roundworms and tapeworms up. Thanks for the heads-up. :-) Dave (talk) 21:01, Apr 4, 2005 (UTC)

Enjoy your vacation. When you get back, you might want to check my user page for a list of articles I've worked on. As I'm just a lowly undergraduate, you may want to fact-check me:-) Dave (talk) 06:21, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for supporting my adminship — I vow to use my super powers for good not evil. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:01, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Giovanni Di Stefano

I've warned Pnazionale (talk • contribs), reverted his changes, and done some sopy-editing/Wikification on the article. I'll keep an eye on it. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 12:47, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, Anilocra

For your supportive vote in my RfA! Yours, El_C 00:39, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks?

Why the suggestions on how to edit? They certainly would have been appreciated when I was starting out, but I think I have the basics down by now. Am I making poor edits anywhere in particular? Hiberniantears 17:22, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

You know... I had even considered starting a talk page just to feel like part of the crowd! :-) Thanks for the welcome! Hiberniantears 17:39, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Time Cube

Glad to see someone is trying to do some sane editing of the Time Cube article. I think the screen grab is a great idea. Please continue adding (or subtracting - I'm still dubious as to the merit of including the "race and religion" material) material. Hopefully we can get a fairly good article in place soon. Any assistance dealing with the revert war or input on the Talk page would be appreciated. Cheradenine 17:00, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]