Talk:Postmaster General of the United Kingdom

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philately Mid‑importance

	Philately portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geoffrey Robinson

I was really confused for a while, because I had read something about Geoffrey Robinson being the Postmaster General before he resigned a couple of years ago, but as this post was abolished in 1969 he couldn't have been. I assumed that the post may have been re-established when BT was privatised. But I've now found the answer. It was a misprint and he was actually Paymaster General Mintguy

Reginald Bevins

Edited page to get rid of Ernest Bevin as Postmaster General 1957-59. Though it is clearly inadequate to have "???" in place of an actual name in the list (and I'd invite anyone in the know to submit the real name), it's also pretty bad to include the name of a man who died six years before talking up a post. Oxymoron 10:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reference should have been to Reginald Bevins, and some of the surrounding dates were incorrect--George Burgess 12:58, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two Postmasters General period

I have converted the list to a wikitable in the style of those used for MP list in constituency articles. This will enable the parties to be added, to verify how true the statement that the two posts were split between parties is. In doing this I have relied on the Falmouth Packet Archives website for the names of Postmasters General. Some were already identified in a previous version of this article; others have been identified from the articles on their titles as peers or from Burkes Peerage (1939 edition). ~~I am not clear whether the Earl of Leicester (who held the post in 1786) was the 1st (died 1786) or 2nd Earl, and have left this linked to Earl of Leicester.~~ The Falmouth Packet Archives website seems to be missing some names and others appear to be incomplete there. I have left these as a "?". Many of the biographic articles on individual Postmasters-General do not indicate that they held the office. Others do not indicate that the person had a colleague. These are all matters requiring attention. A more authoritative source would also be useful. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:32, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correct Earl of Leicester now identified. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:33, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Master of the Kings Post

John Manley (MP) could not have been "Master of the Kings Post" between 1653 and 1655 as the monarchy had been abolished. -- PBS (talk) 15:08, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to this reference he was postmaster under the Commonwealth during those years, so I've added a Commonwealth table. Perhaps Prideaux should be divided into two periods. What do you think? ww2censor (talk) 16:13, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have no particular opinion on it. One point though, up until 30 January 1649 Parliament continued with the fiction that they were loyal subjects of the King and that they were fighting against his misguided advisers, so Edmund Prideaux although a Roundhead would have been styled as a king's servant.

Also I am also not sure how Thomas Witherings and Charles Stanhope etc fit into this. -- PBS (talk) 17:18, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Postmaster General of the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121216110211/http://www.falmouth.packet.archives.dial.pipex.com/id70.htm to http://www.falmouth.packet.archives.dial.pipex.com/id70.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:55, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]