Talk:E-11 blaster rifle

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

Should this article be merged with Weapons of Star Wars? -- FirstPrinciples 11:28, Nov 13, 2004 (UTC)

Carbine?

This gun is really a carbine, isn't it? 00:01, 29 June 2005 User:71.34.218.110
no its two small and portable. and it fires fast 17:45, 15 December 2005 User:168.9.19.101

Restored

See also Talk:DC-15 blaster rifle.

I restored this file because its replacement at Blaster (Star Wars)#E-11 blaster rifle is so short that this page was in effect deleted, not merged. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:46, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
And again. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with whoever did the original merger - most of the content was disregarded because it was in-universe crap of the sort that needs to be purged from our articles. Once this article has been edited to bare minimum standards, it's going to contain about three lines of content - the point of that having it's own article is? --Cameron Scott (talk) 10:55, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That depends on whether the in-universe matter is cruft or crap, or not. Often one man's cruft is another man's important matter. For example, I have no interest in football and to me most football matter is footballcruft, but I do not go around deleting it. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:06, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]