Talk:Finnish Sign Language

Deaf Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of deaf-related and Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the project page or talk page.DeafWikipedia:WikiProject DeafTemplate:WikiProject Deafdeaf articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finland Low‑importance

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

When was finnish sign langauge officially recognised?

In 1995. Added the info to the text. --Farside 18:43, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I found a reference that says Finland was the 3rd country to recognise sign language, but it didn't tell what the other two countries were. If someone knows, please add to the text! --Farside 19:01, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I thought, it was 1955(!) and not 1995, when Finnland recognised the finnish sign language. NewAtair

It was definitely in 1995. Sign languages weren't even considered natural languages before 1970s when the lingvistic studies began, and before 1980s (or somewhere around there) in Finland (and in many, many other countries) those who were born deaf couldn't even intermarry. --Farside 21:46, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)

You are coming from Finland, and therefore I have to believe you. --NewAtair 11:46, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I believe that the French Government after the revolution in 1792 or thereabouts recognised French Sign Langauge in some sense and provided funding for a school that used sign language, although of course Farside is right in suggesting that it wasn't until the late 20th century that sign languages began to be taken seriously as complete languages. ntennis 08:20, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

qs answerd

www DOT eud DOT eu/Finland-i-182.html tells that FInland was 2nd in the world not third. It also says less that 5000 FSL signers (actually they have 4000 odd registered signers, which is probably fairly accurate). etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.96.60 (talk) 20:03, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Finnish Sign Language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080409131458/http://www.kl-deaf.fi/File/66fbe96f-9231-43f2-844d-ef5b765d8b0a/Draft_curriculum_FSL.pdf to http://www.kl-deaf.fi/File/66fbe96f-9231-43f2-844d-ef5b765d8b0a/Draft_curriculum_FSL.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]