Talk:List of aviation, avionics, aerospace and aeronautical abbreviations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Untitled

Moved from Some aeronautical abbreviations because the new title better conforms to WP naming conventions. --Theo (Talk) 09:33, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Should title read "...aeronautical abbreviations and acronyms" since most items in the list are acronyms? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.249.47.176 (talk) 13:46, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that "acronyms" should be added in the title. Indeed, strictly speaking most of the items in this page are acronyms and not abbreviations. --JGG13 (talk) 09:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

Added {{cleanup}} to the page as I noticed it was in pretty bad condition, eg. disambig links and wrong links, etc. --Jeremy 01:54, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance

As a pilot in the US many of these abbreviations/ terms aren't used here at all and even elsewhere are dated

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Move. Was done by someone else. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

List of aeronautical abbreviations → List of aviation, aerospace and aeronautical abbreviations – The page has abbrevs from all those areas of aviation already, and this will bring it in line with its "sister page", List of aviation, aerospace and aeronautical terms.

Survey

Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

Support - as nominator - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 01:09, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

ICO

Waht means ICO ? (mixture in ICO position)--84.137.56.89 19:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be "Idle Cut-Off". Nope? --marsian 14:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CAPS

Many of the entries in this list are in all caps, but should not be per WP:CAPS. Dhaluza 22:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The relevant page of the Manual of Style (WP:Manual of Style/Capital letters) begins: "Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization." The key here is "unnecessary" – thus capitalization that is required by a specific stylistic guideline is not to be avoided. Many acronyms are correctly styled as all caps; see WP:Manual of Style/Capital letters#Acronyms just above the section on All caps. Piperh (talk) 09:37, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.aerospace-technology.com/acronyms
Triggered by \baerospace-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 09:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very poor

This list is very poor. Have a look at the german version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masterlee0423 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

uncomplete

This list is largely uncompleted and somwhere not consistent. You mention E-LSA but nowhere LSA for exmple ? It should be to deliver all basic expressions belonging world's ICAO code --92.106.150.25 (talk) 06:42, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Complete page re-design project. Help needed!!

Hi,

I wish to make this page the most complete abbreviation list available. The German version is a good example and will be a good source since it has many English abbreviations. My plan, inspired by the German version, is to have a table at the beginning with links to all the letters sorted to the second degree. By that I mean AA, AB, AC, etc. Troubling is that I don't know how to create that architecture with all the internal links. Help needed. I am a relatively new Wikipedian, mostly familiar with visual editing.

Any help appreciated

Denis Ranque Denis17.ranque (talk) Denis17.ranque (talk) 12:58, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is another toc template Template:Horizontal TOC which could be tweaked rather than create one by hand, although I dont think it would be that difficult to do just a bit fiddly. MilborneOne (talk) 13:57, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of aviation, aerospace and aeronautical abbreviations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050206170923/http://www.aerospace-technology.com/acronyms/ to http://www.aerospace-technology.com/acronyms

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:53, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Space abbreviations

Does "aerospace abbreviations" include "space abbreviations"? I mean, do space-only terms belong in this list? I have noticed there are not space-only terms in this list (I do not know why) and I would like to include some of them, if this is really the list where they should be... (I did not find any space-specific list somewhere else in wikipedia). What do you think?

Some examples of space-only terms:

Orbits: LEO, MEO, GEO, GTO, HEO, SSO...

Agencies/organizations: NASA, JPL, ULA, ESA, CNES, ASI, DLR, JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, CASC, CAST...

Systems/vehicles/engineering: AOCS, ECLSS, S/C, SCT, ISS, SLS, STS, SSME, ATV, HTV, JWST, TDRS, EDRS, ECSS, PSLV, GSLV, SSLV, SSTO, IOC...

--JGG13 (talk) 08:56, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @JGG13:, I think that would make this list too long and uncomfortable to navigate (Template:Very long). So far, the aviation, aerospace, aeronautical and avionics abbreviations are so interrelated and interconnected that they overlap too much to have separate lists, but spaceflight seems to be - at least to me - a rather separate domain with many purposes, circumstances and technologies that are different from flight within the Earth's atmosphere. I think it's better to reserve a special list for things that only apply to spacecraft and spaceflight, and have that list and this one refer to each other for additional information. Perhaps it's a good idea to expand the List of spacecraft prefixes with the orbits, agencies, and systems/vehicles/engineering acronyms you've listed here? Perhaps this requires a different title, but I think this is the appropriate place for the information you'd like to list. :) Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 12:04, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose to merge Acronyms and abbreviations in avionics into List of aviation, aerospace and aeronautical abbreviations. They are essentially the same, but the latter is more extensive and encompassing than the former, has more references and is linked to more interwikis. No one else seems to have suggested this merger before, so here I am. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 18:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I totally agree with your merger proposal. I think you should do it yourself, if you feel motivated enough and nobody speaks out against it after some days... JGG13 (talk) 18:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It's two days later now, I think nobody is going to object to the merger, so I'm going to proceed and see if I can do it myself. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 12:30, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Courage!! And if you could please answer to my comment immediately above yours ("Space abbreviations") I would appreciate it! I posted it two months ago and it seems nobody cares... JGG13 (talk) 22:19, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It's quite a tedious task, so I'm doing it in stages (just finished A and B). I opted to use ¹ to indicate some abbreviations are homonyms, which could otherwise lead to confusion. I also noticed that some abbreviations use a forward slash /, but synonyms do not, e.g. A/P and AP can both mean 'autopilot'. Normally we would place punctuation before the A in alphabetical orders, but in this case it could lead the same term to be listed twice, the one without a slash much lower down in the list. I don't think that's helpful, and propose to ignore the slash for alphabetical purposes. Also, should we have separate entries for each different spelling of the same term, or will to suffice to note alternatives in the Notes section? Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 12:14, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merger completed. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 11:49, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]