Talk:International Healing Foundation

Untitled

This page is identified on Wikipedia:Cleanup as 'needing massive NPOV', but I have to say it seems fine to me. It's clear from the introduction that the views presented are those of the IHF, and there doesn't seem to be any particular endorsement or rejection of those ideas, except perhaps implicit in the word 'helped' in the last line, which it is also made clear is the IHF's opinion. PlatinumX, can you point to anything specifically POV in the article? -- Karl Naylor 13:51, 16 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I retract my statement and will remove from cleanup; I did not notice "The following outlines the IHF's theory," and the Table of Contents implies that the "outline" is the substance of the article. Perhaps a no-table tag until there are enough sections to create a ==IHF's theory== section? It could be a little clearer -- PlatinumX 22:10, 17 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Good point. I've removed the TOC. -- Karl Naylor 15:35, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)

The old organization of the sections was confusing and unorthodox. I reorganized the article to fix this. Between this and Ifnord's addition of a criticisms section, I will tentatively remove the NPOV tag. Fireplace 05:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From Wikipedia:Cleanup

International Healing Foundation needs massive NPOV treatment also -- PlatinumX - I disagree, see talk page Karl Naylor

IMHO what the article needed was a statement of criticisms of this organization's support of Reparative therapy. I have included this, and replaced the TOC. Ifnord 23:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like Fireplace's use of the {main} template to link to Reparative therapy. Well-organized articles, that's what we need around here. --Uncle Ed 00:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]