Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clockcrew (0th nomination)

This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of the pages entitled Clockcrew, OrangeClock, and StrawberryClock.

This page is kept as an historic record.

The result of the debate was to delete the article.

Vanity. RickK 00:50, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, it's not even informative vanity. --Starx 02:51, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete them all, vanity. --Stormie 03:24, May 16, 2004 (UTC)
Delete all of them, vanity. I mean, they're not even good vanity. DO'Neil 08:03, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Like the Newgrounds entry isn't enough. --Feedle 08:38, 16 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all three. -- Cyrius|&#9998 22:07, May 16, 2004 (UTC)
Delete all three. Andris 01:06, May 17, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Not funny.Beelzebubs 01:07, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I've hung around Newgrounds a very little and have heard of these people, so they exist. The pages as they stand are useless vanity, though. If not delete, redirect to Newgrounds. --Suitov 15:36, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Horrid vanity. Delete all three. - Lucky 6.9 16:22, 17 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete. The clock crew is a thriving large community, with far more Flash animations, both quality and quantity wise, and yet david firth has his own page, and even 3 pages devoted to his animations, and a community with over 2000 members doesn't even has it's own page?

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue or the deletion should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.