Talk:1992–93 NHL season

Untitled

Seems like vandals have striked. I don't think Toronto won the Stanley Cup. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.195.201.60 (talk) 19:42, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Was the '75' logo ever used during the 1992-93 season? I've got plenty of pictures (NHL guide & record book, hockey cards, etc) from the 1991-92 season where the players have the 75 patch on their jerseys, but as far as I can tell, the Stanley Cup 100th anniversary logo was used throughout the 1992-93 season. Aottley 14:59, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that 75 logo here [1] for 1992. I assumed that it meant the 1992-93 season. Since I am in Korea, it is difficult for me to find reliable sources for hockey. If I was back in Canada i could just look through some old magazines and hockey cards laying around that I have. But I'm not, so I can't. So, if I made a mistake, please fix it. Please feel free to fix any mistakes that I make on any article. RG has been fixing boo-boos of mine and I appreciate it very much.Masterhatch 15:50, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Would anyone mind if I added the list of the head coaches employed by each team during this specific season? Ericster08 20:56, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why is the toronto-los angeles section so huge? i mean it's freaking huge. someone should edit it down considerably. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.66.2.120 (talk) 00:48, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

also, i think all articles on wikipedia in regards to nhl seasons and playoffs should presented the same. the difference between 1992-92 and 1993-94 seasons in how they are presented is astounding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.66.2.120 (talk) 00:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you're talking about formatting, then by all means go ahead and make them uniform. However, I think that articles that lack information regarding what actually happened during the season are inferior to articles like this one that have such information. Whatever you do, don't remove that kind of content without consensus. Croctotheface 01:45, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well, the toronto-los angeles section needs to be flushed out somehow. I'm not going to do it, but it sure does need to be edited for brevity and content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.66.2.120 (talk) 02:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Milestone goals in neutral site games?

I think that the fey milestone goals scored in neutral locations should be noted. You guys? 24.87.56.142 (talk) 02:18, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gilmour/Gretzky.

What, this was this the only controversial incident of the entire 1992-93 season? Does it need such a large (and poorly worded) piece of the overall article? Perplexed 21:00, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Probably not the only controversial incident, and certainly there were other incidents during the playoffs (like the penalty for using an illegal stick that Marty McSorley got during the final series - it turned the tide and helped lead to a Montreal win), but the reason this is so big and controversial is because it's Toronto. The media and their fans have a tendency to overhype things like this. It's just the whole "they were robbed" idea that most fans will latch onto when their team loses. Sure, a penalty probably should have been called on Gretzky, but that happens all the time. The 1999 final Brett Hull's skate was in the crease, in violation of the rules, during the cup winning goal. If you want to go further back, look at Maurice Richard's suspension (the one that caused the riot). The Habs, and their fans, were robbed that year.

Having said that, it would be worthy of a mention, along with other incidents (not necessarily controversial ones, but one's like McSorley's stick), but as it stands, on it's own, it's overblown. Viruk42 (talk) 02:16, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

considering also that it has zero sources, I would argue that its grounds for deletion or definately consolidation. Many teams win the season series but it doesnt mean they win in the playoffs, just look at the sens-mapleleafs playoff stories, ottawa won most games each year but lost in the playoffs to the leafs everytime. Doesnt mean they would have won against montreal (in fact montreal only had 3 playoff loses in the first 3 rounds), just means they had a tough break in one game. And if im not mistaken this happened in game 6, but didnt that series go to 7 games? hardly a series controversey just a game controversy70.49.155.40 (talk) 00:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kerry Fraser finally admitted his mistake, though Gilmour took some of the blame. (What a nice guy.) [2] But yes, this incident was during game 6 of a 7-game series. 15:14, 6 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Perplexed (talk • contribs)