Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sctief
Appearance
Sctief is not notable. The term was apparently intoduced in some survey. The rest of the page is probably own research. Sander123 15:08, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete (nonsense). The article itself admits that the term has absolutely no meaning, and is in search of backronymization. Aerion 20:13, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete Patent nonsense. EagleFalconn 20:37, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Speedy delete for patent nonsense. It's that bad. Geogre 22:35, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Say what? Delete. Too unfunny for BJAODN. - Lucky 6.9 00:43, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- del. Mikkalai 08:59, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not quite nonsense, but close. Hardly "popularised" if it has <500 Google hits. [[User:David Johnson|David Johnson [T|C]]] 13:44, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems pointless to me. Somebody in the WWW 06:55, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)