Talk:Open city
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Open city article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comments
[edit]There was no article here, so i put down the little knowledge i have on this subject, feel free to add or change.
- there is no mention of allied bombing of Rome _after_ it being declared an open city.. I dont have the time right now to find sources for this but i know it as fact so if someone cares to bother feel free to balance this Allied biased perspective on the concept of >open cities< - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.178.171.134 (talk) 18:49, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
rules of war
[edit]alright then an open city can not be attacked as it is presumably just "march on". So if the attacker bomb the city in a "we're-just-checking" campaign before marching on, or march on running with flamethrowers burning the hell out of everything and screaming "we're the champions" it would BREAK the rules, but if the army just march on and guerrilla fighters from resistence movements attack them, are they breaking rules? sure yes, but then, who should take the blame, if the city is open and the invaded country has nothing to do with it anymore? the acts commited by the guerrilla are held on the state or are just marked as "impolite oh-jee-you're-beaking-the-rules"? if there is the confirmation of guerrila fighters infiltrated in the city the attackers can wash it way from the world without disrespect rules then? someone could explain that? it's kinda weird. i mean 'cause it's obvious you will not just walk in and be the nice guy if you know you will be shot dead by hidden bad dressed people. ps: guerrilla is a coward thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.25.43.243 (talk • contribs)
What an idiotic prose. What are you trying to say!?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.40.139.109 (talk) 11:02, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Oslo?
[edit]There's no citation, but Oslo is reported as being declared an open city during the German invasion of Norway in 1940.
[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.165.220.12 (talk) 17:13, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Open city. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061002165549/http://bletchleypark.net/ww2/ww2-1944.html to http://www.bletchleypark.net/ww2/ww2-1944.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:16, 11 January 2016 (UTC)