User talk:Sonett72

This user may have left Wikipedia. Sonett72 has not edited Wikipedia since October 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Saab images

Hi,

I like the images of Saab's you're uploading. I've a picture of the first Saab on the german wikipedia at http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bild:DCP_1391.JPG , perhaps you can use it.

Yes, that is a great picture of the Ursaab! But the name of the file 'DCP 1391.JPG' is not very clear.... I will use it in the Ursaab article (still to be written).

The drawings you upload, what is the source of those, did you draw them yourself? -- JeLuF 19:38, Jun 16, 2004 (UTC)

click on a picture and read the info - they are line drawings by Gunnar A. Sjögren from his book The SAAB Way. This book is entirely on line, follow the external link on the 'GAS' article. MH 19:50, 2004 Jun 16 (UTC)

I've looked at Image:Saabasj97.jpg, where this message was missing, and I didn't look closely enough to the others. Thank's for adding it. -- JeLuF 19:56, Jun 16, 2004 (UTC)

I was working on it, the message is there now. MH 20:03, 2004 Jun 16 (UTC)

It looks like the image Image:C900conv.jpg you uploaded risks being deleted. Could you perhaps add the necessary information. // Liftarn

Ford Essex picture

You should probably put down the exact source of this image. —Morven 04:14, Aug 26, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for your help!

Thanks for your help with the South Park Republican page. As you can see my speling suks :-)

But whats with all the question marks instead of apostrophies?!

Nice point on the fear of strangers thing.

jucifer 02:51, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Siphon diagram

Great diagram of a siphon, thanks. Would you be able to add labels for the points and heights described in the Bernoulli's equation section? Thanks. Samw 04:30, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Many thanks for the diagram! Samw 02:06, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)

period at the end of sentence

Hi and thanks for your changes to rate of fluid flow. I have just one remark. Could you please put a period at the end of a formula, if that formula is at the end of sentence? This is the standard math usage, and it looks better in general. Thank you. Oleg Alexandrov 16:45, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Miraflores disambiguation

Hi, I notice you've created a disambiguation page for the word Miraflores. Disambiguation pages should include links to each place's article page. Please add these links. Even if the place has no article yet, you should add a red link, and someone will eventually create the article. Greetings, --Tuomas ^hello 22:13, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)

British spelling

Sonett, it is in poor taste to convert American spelling to British spelling without reason, such as changing from "neighbors" to "neighbours" in Parallel parking. I refer you to Wikipedia:Manual of style:

If an article is predominantly written in one type of English, aim to conform to that type rather than provoking conflict by changing to another. (Sometimes, this can happen quite innocently, so please don't be too quick to make accusations!)

The article in question is written predominantly for those who drive on the right side of the road, which is explicitly not Britain. As the primary author of that article, I am not bothered by this, but someone else may find a problem with this behavior. --Cluster 23:22, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image:Homokinetic-joint.jpg

I noticed you uploaded this image about a year ago—it would be great if you could add references to the numbered parts in the articles in which it is used. Thanks! Postdlf 16:28, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

List of second moments of area

I think the 'List of second moments of area' should be a separate article. I think it was a mistake to combine the two quantities (moment of inertia and second moment of inertia), as it confuses two very different physical quantities. The fact that their derivation is similar shouldn't distract us from that and combining them, in my opinion, is like combining articles on mass transfer and fluid mechanics because you can derive both sets of governing equations from Reynolds transport theorem.

Also, 'moment of inertia' and 'second moment of inertia' are two separate articles-- I created the second one--(I'm the person behind the IP address) and I edited the 'moment of inertia' article to tease the two issues apart (which I think makes sense). If 'moment of inertia' and 'second moment of inertia' are separate articles-- why combine the lists? -- I don't think it makes sense to combine the lists and this is why I made a separate article.

I think it is very awkward to have two different tables in the same article. Merging the two tables would be better-- but that cannot really be done for practical reasons.

If different things are combined-- I think 'area moments of inertia' should be combined with the centroid ---- and 'mass moments of inertia' with 'mass center' (this is how my statics textbook (Meriam JL, Kraige LG, Engineering mechanics, 3rd Ed., John wiley & Sons, Inc., 1993.) presents the quantities.

Also, if they are to remain merged the article should be renamed. "List of moments of inertia" suggests the quality associated with angular acceleration only-- and that is in fact how the article was created --OR-- the title is less clear than it could be. A more appropriate name would be 'List of moments of inertia and second moments of inertia.'

I think things should be kept as simple as possible. If the connection between moment of inertia and second moment of inertia is so important -- perhaps a separate article should be written (like one could be written about Reynolds transport theorem).

Image:Bermoullilaw.jpg

Just notifying you that I've added this image to WP:IFD. I'll list all my concerns on the image's page in a moment, but the short of it is that I've created what I think is a better version and added it to Commons. --MannyMax 04:40, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CGI

What is a Computer graphics interface? Oh, and BTW, there's a relatively new guideline called [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)]] that you may be interested in. Josh Parris ✉ 23:27, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eameslounch.jpg

I'd like to include some more images from steelform.com, did you ask for specific permission to use this file or do they have a blanket policy i haven't noticed? Thanks... Dirt 23:36, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Leuke toevoegingen op wiki NL

nl:Spanning-rekdiagram als je nog toevoegingen wenst te doen op wiki NL... daar hebben ze wat minder mensen ;-) MADe

Fishing hook

Hi, in your contribution to Fishing hook you made a red-link to Fishing spoons. Are fishing spoons the same thing as a Spoon lure? Just wondering. Gaius Cornelius 16:55, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Arquitectos

Hola Sonett

Estas elaborando una lista de arquitectos cuando ya se categorizó la anterior lista y se eliminó la misma hace poco. He puesto el cartel "destruir" porque en wikipedia español hemos dedicido suprimir en la medida de lo posible las listas, de forma que te lo aviso por si te estás tomando mucho trabajo en ello, que sepas que seguramente te lo borren. Un saludo, Hispa

Hola: Sonet72 sólo quería decirte que el redirect entre distintas wikis no funciona. Así que tus redirect en es: sólo muestran el enlace aquí. Espero seguir viéndote en los Cambios recientes de es:. Saludos --Sanbec 13:17, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Fir e Fo x 17:53, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish armada

Your point under the Discussion heading in this article is a fair one, but the comments that accompany it should be relegated to the discussion page.--shtove 14:03, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Watersplash

Thanks for merging the watersplash stuff I did into Ford (river) I got very confused. Especially as I couldn't find it in the first place. scaree 17:26, 16 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Stress v strain A36.png

Thanks for pointing out the typo. You are right that the strain scale is wrong, it's more like a high-strength steel then structural steel. It's hard to show both the slope of the elastic portion of the curve and the full width of the plastic portion in a plot that doesn't take up the entire page. I'll play with it a bit, see if I can't make it look better.

What do you mean about "reference numbers" - maybe sigma sub y and sigma sub u? Toiyabe 19:27, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've made another go of it -

Reference numbers are:

1 - Ultimate Strength

2 - Yield Strength

3 - Rupture

4 - Strain-hardening region

5 - Necking region

What do you think? Toiyabe 18:59, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK, here's another one -

I based this on the one at the Dutch wiki - [1]

I'd like your opinion on the reference numbers -

Is B or C in the yield strength? What is the other one?

Region I should be the elastic range. Is that drawn correctly, or should it end at 'B'?

What's a good term for Region II? 'Yield Region'? Toiyabe 21:18, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SECAM vs. SÉCAM

I do not think SÉCAM is the proper abbreviation, but rather that SECAM is. I would not normally comment to you, as both forms are used in the article, but I am doing so because you changed the abbreviation SECAM to SÉCAM on multiple instances. Please see the talk page about the issue, as I am considering moving the page to SECAM, which would be highly inconsistent if all instances of the acronym on the page used SÉCAM.—Kbolino 04:22, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Armada in Ireland

We meet again. Thanks for the links in this article. I was looking forward to the article on Juan Martinez de Recalde, but sadly it's all red letters.--Shtove 17:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geer Geertsen van Rötterdam

Thanks, bud, for this one. Experienced ones, keeping on the good job, are the greatest mirror where green ones can reflect themselves. Again, tnx. Emilio 15:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Carburetor

I've reverted your deletion of the nomenclature from image:CarbNomenclature.jpg. Moving the nomenclature to the image file page requires multiple clicks to view it, and putting it in the caption makes it difficult to view the image and the nomenclature at the same time. I've also swapped the positions of the two images in Carburetor, since the cross-sectional schematic goes better with the operational-basics section of the article. Scheinwerfermann 14:52, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was a silly thing to do. You may have created it, but you don't own it!

I never claimed to own it; let's be grownups and leave the namecalling and putting words in others' mouths out on the playground where they belong. The image with nomenclature is used in the English-language carburetor article right now, and that's appropriate. If you want to use it in other-language articles, that's terrific...use image:CarbNoNomenclature.jpg , which has the lettered arrows without the English nomenclature. Scheinwerfermann 18:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hunebed-d27.jpg

Hallo, zou jij deze afbeelding ook in de nederlandse wikipedia willen uploaden? FANSTAR 11:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Holset Turbocharger

Where was the picture of the Kromhout diesel engine with the Holset turbochargers taken?

In a water supply pumping station, north-east NL. The engine drives a generator for emergency power supply. MH 23:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Erroneous edit to Ignition timing article

I have had to revert a technically incorrect edit that you made to the ignition timing article. The vacuum source used to operate vacuum advance is not always manifold vacuum. Please take the time to read the whole section to understand what ported vacuum is and how it operates before making further edits to this article. If you believe that you can expand the article, that's great but please make sure that your contributions are technically valid. --Athol Mullen 22:23, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Woodgasgenerator.jpg

Any chance you could provide a translation of the text in that photograph? I realize that's a pretty difficult thing to do on something so technical (not to mention the fact that I'm not sure it's Dutch) but even a rough approximation would be helpful. scot 21:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.gengas.nu/byggbes/10.shtml is a diagram of an identical gasifier. It doesn't have all the terms as the one you uploaded, but it's got most of them... scot 22:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Caucasia.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Caucasia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Sandozlogo.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sandozlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License of Microswitches.jpg

Hi Sonett72! I was looking at Image:Microswitches.jpg, and noticed that you said that it was a "scan". Is this a scan of a photograph? If so, did you take the photograph? If not, the image is probably being used in violation of copyright, and we need to either obtain permission to use it or delete the image. Please let me know! Thanks, bdesham ★ 02:50, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pore water pressure

I note you have previously edited the above. I have added a couple of defintions from a British standard I was looking at. I have read a lot on wiki but this is my first edit. I am not educated (self teaching) in this area. I would be grateful if you could edit so I don't offend.

Message

Sorry to edit your page like this but I wanted to know what the official source is for the Dutch Standards [2] page. I have this [3] source but its not as complete as yours - Vortexswirl.

PS I am struggling to understand the definitions I have added... but they are right as I have copied and checked them for accuracy and I don't think this is a problem as I have provided references?

Edit summary

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. --Berland 13:03, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Estilo de páginas de desambiguación en ES

Hola, ví que editaste algunas páginas en la WP en español. Cuando edites páginas de desambiguación por favor no remuevas la negrita (bold) de los enlaces (links), ya que forma parte de las reglas de estilo de PD.
Gracias, saludos. --Martin Rizzo 18:27, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ford Taunus V4 engine

Sorry for you, but there never was a 2.0 litre version of this engine. The 2.0 litre V4 engine used in the Ford Transit until 1978 was the british Ford Essex V4 engine (also used in passenger cars Ford Zephyr 4, Ford Corsair and Ford Consul Mk 3). I ask for your understanding that I reverted your contribution to the Ford Taunus V4 engine. 84.140.38.53 18:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hydropower Physics questions

Hi Sonett72,

I am interested in an addition you made to the 'Hydropower' article on the 25th July 2005. In it you added to the 'Physics' sebsection.

I would like to know where you got your source material for this from since I am interested in quantifying the kinetic power of water where there is no significant change in elevation. I am therefore interested in the final equation added to this section in particular (for which I independently derived the same equation).

P={\frac {1}{2}}\,\rho \,A\,v^{3}.

Also, do you know why has the symbol \phi</math> for discharge been replaced by \varphi</math> in later versions of the article?

Thanks,

Chris M Parker 10:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Borgwarnerlogo.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Borgwarnerlogo.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 20:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Homokinetic-joint.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Homokinetic-joint.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 23:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Ford_V4.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Ford_V4.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 15:35, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:FordEssexV6.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:FordEssexV6.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 15:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Saabmoosetest.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Saabmoosetest.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Saabtrollsticker.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Saabtrollsticker.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Koonsballoonsbilbao.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Koonsballoonsbilbao.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:09, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:800px-Rabbit Jeff Koons.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:800px-Rabbit Jeff Koons.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Aptera Typ-1 Wallpaper-nowatermark.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Aptera Typ-1 Wallpaper-nowatermark.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:27, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:800px-Rabbit Jeff Koons.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:800px-Rabbit Jeff Koons.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Caucasia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Caucasia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Expansiontank.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Sonett72!
We thank you for uploading Image:Expansiontank.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Canti2.jpg

Har du någon bättre källa till varifrån Image:Canti2.jpg kommer och hur den släpptes fri? Det skulle behövas annars riskerar den raderas. // Liftarn (talk)

NowCommons: Image:Piston.jpg

Image:Piston.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Piston and connecting rod.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Piston and connecting rod.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request to move article Monte Carlo incomplete

You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Monte Carlo to a different title - however your request is either incomplete or has been contested for being controversial, and has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete will be removed after five days.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:

Added {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
Added a place for discussion at the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved. This can easily be accomplished by adding {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the page, which will automatically create a discussion section there.
Added {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 17:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spykerstamp.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spykerstamp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:37, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert J. Sinclair

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Robert J. Sinclair, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Although I do believe that this person's notability could be established, this article would need a fundamental rewrite to make it not read like an obituary.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt (talk) 09:03, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Bobsinclair-sandiego07-saab9-5.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bobsinclair-sandiego07-saab9-5.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Bob-AnneSinclair.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bob-AnneSinclair.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:07, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Robert J. Sinclair

On May 24, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robert J. Sinclair, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Jamie^☆S93 12:56, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation on Mark Twain

Hey man, I can see you want to help, but it is standard (and correct) to have punctuation *inside* the double quote. I don't think you should be changing punctuation in articles to a less standard form. Cratylus3 (talk) 20:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Garage doors

Please for goodness sake, if you must keep a photo of your garage doors on Post and lintel, then shut the doors so nobody can see your car or whatever else it is you don't want people to see, and then take a decent high resolution photo of it. An image with that crude blanking only deserves to be deleted. Sorry, but I'm sure you can see some point in this? ProfDEH (talk) 17:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:KarinSlaughterbookcover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:KarinSlaughterbookcover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Irukandji jellyfish-2

I saw the edit you made to the page Irukandji jellyfish-2 and reverted it, as it appeared to be unconstructive, in that it changed the redirect by blanking the page. Should it be listed for speedy deletion? I must be missing something, so forgive me if I stepped on your toes. Geoff ^T ^C 23:57, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sonett72. You have new messages at Glane23's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File:Saab96stamp.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Saab96stamp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:49, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saab96stamp2.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Saab96stamp2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Saab91safir.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Saab91safir.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:57, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Wheelbolt.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wheelbolt.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Terraplane1.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Terraplane1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. While you can indeed photograph a whole car and show the logo, photographing just the logo might not be ok. The de minimis article explains why this is. Regards, Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Saabdraken.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Saabdraken.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 18:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Patmossbookcover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Patmossbookcover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Scammell-s24-brazil.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Scammell-s24-brazil.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. TheGrappler (talk) 22:27, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saab96lastvin.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Saab96lastvin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:12, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Supacat-brazil.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Supacat-brazil.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:36, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 05:05, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Timing belt (camshaft)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Timing belt (camshaft), has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 12:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Trumpetjunction.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Trumpetjunction.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:04, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stackedjunction.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stackedjunction.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lintel.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lintel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bob-AnneSinclair.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bob-AnneSinclair.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bobsinclair-sandiego07-saab9-5.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bobsinclair-sandiego07-saab9-5.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bobsinclair-sandiego07-saab9-5.jpg

You uploaded, File:Bobsinclair-sandiego07-saab9-5.jpg, where you either stated that you had permission to upload it or that evidence of such permission would be provided on request. Wikipedia needs the permission to be explicit and proven at the time of upload.

Please read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, which advises on how to confirm the permission you obtained from a third party.

It is also advisable to ask the third-party what source attribution they desire, as opposed to marking the image as having been "sent personally".Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:39, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Staticallyindeterminate.jpg

The file File:Staticallyindeterminate.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]