Talk:PSG (disambiguation)

Comments

Are all these notable? I'm tempted to delete all except the two that have articles. sjorford 14:44, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Not to you maybe, but yes, I only added expansions that I thought would become articles someday. Certainly I didn't go to the trouble of adding them just so they could be deleted later. Some probably exist already, under different titles. Stan 17:21, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Duplicate

Paramount Stations Group is listed twice here, once under Arts and media and once under Businesses and organizations. Which one should be removed? Glades12 (talk) 07:31, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Requested move 10 March 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 20:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

---

PSG → PSG (disambiguation) – (to redirect PSG to Paris Saint-Germain F.C.) Easily the primary meaning of this initialism by usage: the club alone gets 80% of the pageviews of all topics listed here, and more strongly it gets 95%ish of clicks per WikiNav. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 05:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 00:08, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

• This is another interesting test case for primary topic by usage. The sum of redirects here is shown like this, there's two redirects. The total monthly incoming traffic in January for the sum of them was 1959, 929 and 0, so 2888. The middle number is missing from WikiNav, it's a known bug. In the same month we had identifed 2021 clickstreams to the proposed primary topic, plus 55 for women and 22 for academy, and the other identifiable clickstreams are less than that. That's actually only about ~70% compared to total incoming traffic. At the same time, the list was composed by someone who clearly didn't know about MOS:DABCOMMON, as the most common meaning is in the 6th section (Sports), which could be contributing to some of the remaining ~30% readers not clicking through, too. The disambiguation for this TLA has existed since 2003, and the history shows only a handful of attempts to short-circuit this in twenty years. Given recent experiences with primary topic discussions (cf. WT:D) I think we should ponder long-term significance better here, too. --Joy (talk) 13:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

  Thanks for looking into the WikiNav details, Joy, that's always a bit confusing.

  On measures of long-term significance, searches for psg unsurprisingly return results just for the club on Google Search, News, and Images; a Books search for psg -author:psg gives first several for the club and then various science uses; and Scholar gives no results for the club. Also, unless something's off with syntax, polysomnography beats the club handily on ngrams, and it's the reverse on Trends. So it's overall a mixed bag; I still think the dominance in usage stats suggests a redirect would help most readers. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 17:52, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

  It's rather unfortunate, agreed. When thinking of books ngrams, I find it interesting to add the baseline term, with wildcards, and the *gram version for *graphy, like this. There seems to be quite a bit of of an indication that there is significant ambiguity there, and readers are not really astonished they have to click again. --Joy (talk) 06:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

• Support per nom.  — Amakuru (talk) 15:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
• Support. Primary topic by pageviews, web search and clickstream. Celia Homeford (talk) 12:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.