Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Test Match
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Rich Farmbrough 02:53, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Same as First Test Match (no chance for encyclopedic article, longstanding listing at WP:CP) Delete. DanKeshet 01:18, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, trivial, not encyclopaedic. Megan1967 02:22, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Let me get this straight - we have an article about the score in one particular test match played between two specific countries in 2004? A copyvio at that? From the first website that cricket fans check for live scores? Seriously, why? -- Brhaspati (talkcontribs) 04:15, 2005 Mar 6 (UTC)
- Delete: Copyvio, and there are several "second test match"es. I'd have thought this was a test page and therefore a CSD. (shrug) Geogre 04:40, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Arguably not a copyvio, but delete anyway - Wikipedia is not cricinfo.com. sjorford →•← 08:48, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Already marked copyvio - David Gerard 10:03, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.