Talk:RSA/to do
< Talk:RSA
- A rigorous and correct treatment of padding is essential for this article to avoid being misleading.
- In the paragraph "Security", I think the figure 1999 must be reviewed.
- It should be reviewed whether a 256 bit key can be factored in hours on a personal computer. I can factor them in minutes on my (somewhat old) machine.
- At least one illustration of RSA (as noted here)
- It is given two competing proofs of correctness, wich is very non-encyclopedic; remove the "simple" one, which (as noted) does not hold for all x, and improve the other.
- Typographically, the article suffers from non-homogeneous layout of formula (HTML intermixed with Tex)
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "RSA/to do" page.
